Civil
Union Bill approved in National Assembly
The historic Civil Union Bill which allows same-sex marriages was approved
in the National Assembly in South Africa on Tuesday 14 November 2006.
Earlier
this year the Constitutional Court set a deadline for 1 December for
legislation to be passed by Parliament to legitimize same-sex marriages.
The hotly debated bill was approved by 230 votes to 41 in the 400 member
national assembly, but must now still be approved by Parliament's second
house, the National Council of Provinces, before it can be signed into
law by President Thabo Mbeki.
The
bill is not due to be debated in the National Council of Provinces until
November 27, which leaves President Mbeki at most 72 hours to sign the
bill into law to meet the deadline set by the Constitutional Court.
The
chairperson of the Lesbian and Gay Equality Project, Jonathan Berger,
said the new bill was a "victory for gay and lesbian people".
However,
he said many aspects were still unsatisfactory. Section 6 of the bill,
regarding freedom of conscience, indicates that marriage officers are
allowed to object to marrying same-sex couples, but not heterosexual
pairs. And what is most problematic for Berger is that the Marriage
Act remains unchanged. He said there was no rationale for having two
separate pieces of legislation that mean same-sex couples are kept out
of the scope of the Marriage Act.
"There
are many inconsistencies," he said.
|
| South
African High Court Says Yes to Gay Marriage
By Ross von Metzke
(Johannesburg, South Africa) – The high court of South Africa
ruled Thursday that same-sex marriages will enjoy the same legal status
as those between men and women, making the nation one of just five worldwide
that have removed legal barriers to gay and lesbian unions.
But the Constitutional Court effectively stayed its ruling for one year
to give Parliament time to amend a 1961 marriage law. Should legislature
balk, the court said the law will be automatically changed to make its
provisions gender-neutral.
Few expect Parliament to resist, though African nations are generally
intolerant of gay relationships and many South Africans are conservative
on social issues.
The African National Congress, which controls the presidency and more
than two-thirds of parliament's seats, was silent on the court's decision.
The Constitutional Court's ruling expanded on a 2004 decision by the
national Supreme Court of Appeal that affirmed the marriage of a lesbian
couple, who were nonetheless unable to register their union with the
government's Home Affairs department. The government had appealed the
ruling, arguing that the Supreme Court had encroached on Parliament's
authority to make laws.
But the Constitutional Court said that the refusal to give legal status
to gay marriages, though grounded in common law, violated the constitution's
guarantee of equal rights. The justices said marriage laws must be amended
to include the words "or spouse" alongside provisions that
now refer to husbands and wives.
Thursday’s decision was unanimous, with one of the court's 12
judges arguing that the ruling should take effect immediately rather
than being stayed.
Homosexuality in South Africa is not the burning social issue it is
on the American political right, according to political analysts from
the region.
South African gay men and lesbians have recently won a series of court
rulings extending to them the rights and protections afforded other
citizens.
The government-sponsored tourism board announced an advertising blitz
in Britain aimed at attracting gay couples to Cape Town this week. The
campaign is geared around the slogan, “for the honeymoon of their
dreams in 2006.”
"It's not one of our political fault lines," said Steven E.
Friedman, a top political analyst at Johannesburg's Center for Political
Studies, a nonprofit research center. “The major issue in this
society is race. That's why people join political parties.”
Last week, South African born actress Charlize Theron told US television
program Extra she and fiancée Stuart Townsend would get married
when gay relationships were legalized in the United States.
No word yet if the legalization in her homeland qualified for an engagement.
December
6, 2005
EDITORIAL BY RITA
Same-sex marriage ruling a positive step
South Africa will be the first African nation to legalize same-sex unions.
-
South Africa is on its way to becoming the first African nation, and
the fifth in the world, to legalize same-sex marriage. Under a ruling
by the highest court, South African Parliament has one year to change
the words husband and wife to spouse in the marital laws.
This is a positive move forward for South Africa. Many hope its effect
will be positive in a nation where homosexuality is taboo. Gay activists
in South Africa hope this ruling will lessen violence and ridicule among
homosexual men and women. Activists also hope it will lessen rape of
lesbian women, which is common from men who hope to “cure”
them. The ruling is a watershed moment for human rights. By recognizing
the validity of same-sex unions South Africa is not only becoming a
world leader in equality, but also breaking down old stereotypes of
GLBT people. Furthermore, this ruling will allow South Africa to move
forward as one nation to tackle the problem of AIDs and HIV —
a problem that affects nearly 20 percent of all adults in the country.
It is not a “gay” problem but a problem that affects all
sectors.
In a country infamous for its apartheid it gives one hope to see how
much progress can be made in the area of equality. The decision in South
African courts is one that should be made in the United States. Canada,
the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain are the other nations that have legalized
same-sex unions. In the United States, same-sex marriage is legal in
Massachusetts. In California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia,
Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey and Vermont people in same-sex unions can
get legal status similar to civil marriage. Even though South Africa
largely is intolerant of homosexual men and women, it’s Parliament
has made a move that will improve the state of human rights and violence.
Hopefully other countries will follow suit.
The United States must follow suit and recognize that discrimination
against homosexuals must not continue. |